Here's a novel idea..

topic posted Sat, February 23, 2008 - 11:07 AM by  ~{Jaded}~
...guaranteed to get shot down, but..

Why does Tribe allow people to have multiple "alts" to begin with? Could they not limit someone to just one login based on IP? If this person is unsubbed based on this IP, they can't join back from that IP. Would solve a lot of our problems.

Shoot away, boys and girls.
  • Re: Here's a novel idea..

    Sat, February 23, 2008 - 11:14 AM
    Why does Tribe allow people to have multiple "alts" to begin with? >>>>
    It allows users to have freedom of expression...

    ...
    there's no point in making across the board restrictions...
    because of a few boneheads.
    • Re: Here's a novel idea..

      Sat, February 23, 2008 - 2:34 PM
      There's also no way to do it so far. All you need is a new e-mail address. They can't yet block IP addresses, I'm guessing. I don't think there's a way in any social networking site to do it yet.
      • Re: Here's a novel idea..

        Sat, February 23, 2008 - 2:56 PM
        I think there is IP blocking. It's a little tricky, but it's out there. I know that when submitting sites for web searches so they will get hits the search engines will determine if you have submitted a site multiple times by the IP you send from. If they can do it, so can a social networking site.
    • Unsu...
       

      Re: Here's a novel idea..

      Sat, February 23, 2008 - 5:49 PM
      Mike puffed on the pipe that Albert Einstein bequethed to him, and while tugging on the lapels of his tweed jacket with leather elbow patchs, opined:

      "there's no point in making across the board restrictions... because of a few boneheads. "

      __________

      In other words, what Mike is saying is that he likes it - and I mean he really likes it - when rules are applied to people who he complains about. But while he has recognized himself as both a genius and a revolutionary, he does not stop to consider what would happen if the people he complains about were to actually start complaining back to the TOU GUY about all of HIS dirty deeds, including his many nasty attack alts.
      • Unsu...
         

        Re: Here's a novel idea..

        Sat, February 23, 2008 - 7:01 PM
        That is also part of the problem, isn't it.

        That most people don't complain to TOU because they, themselves have something to hide.

        Or that they who complain, assume that TOU will see things from their side. And understand completely.

        TOU is run by people. People are fallible. There is no guarantee that one's point of view will be seen or understood.

        There's a lot of crap that has gone down, right? What if we all started now, started fresh, the best we can? That would be a good thing.
  • Unsu...
     

    Re: Here's a novel idea..

    Sat, February 23, 2008 - 2:56 PM
    There are sites that do specify ONE account for one REAL person and that REAL person has to be you.

    Facebook is one. Multiply.

    Some will go as far as saying that the only image for an avatar that is allowed must be an image of yourself.

    And that any images you post in your profile can only be images you, yourself have taken or created. Period.

    That does give the sites standing on removing people or images that are not theirs. Or on accounts that are pretending to be someone else, or something else. No, people don't get to be a political figure or a dead movie star or their pet goldfish. All those accounts could be unsubbed immediately. So that if someone has the name "George Washington" with an image of that dead president, that account can be removed instantly. Even if the person has the name "George Washington" in real life, they are obviously not THAT George Washington.

    There was no limit on the freedom of expression when I used to participate in various chats on AOL. There was a Cat group, and they had hosted chats every hour. One of the chats focused around people pretending to be their cats. And talking silly. I didn't get it. I thought it was stupid. I'm not good at that. But the screen names didn't change, just the text typed changed, and it was effective.

    There are a few legitimate reasons why alts might be necessary on Tribe.net. Remember that this is NOT a private site. And it has everything from family-friendly topics like Recipes (yummy) to Sexual preferences. You never see recipes in Hustler and you never see a sex act in Good Housekeeping. But we have it all here.

    Not to mention the other categories, Business. For Sale. Rooms for rent. People in daily life separate aspects of their life from each other. There is a "work you" and a "cooking you" and a "family you" and a "sexual you" and so on. I don't really want and/or need to know what recipes or sexual preferences someone has if I am looking to buy a computer printer. And that person selling the printer wants to sell the printer and not discuss the tasty lemon cake recipe or their new paddle.

    Which is again why I think that Tribe.net needs to separate into two distinct sites. Adult/mature/sexual/nudity. And Family-friendly.

    Secondly that the Adult one should require payment. And some sort of generic warning page about being over 18. No access unless you are paid. That cuts way back on alts or trolling in some forums right away.

    The family friendly area would have TOU enforced. As in NO SWEARING. NO SEX IMAGES. Different names for different sections. Different log-ins.
    • Re: Here's a novel idea..

      Sat, February 23, 2008 - 3:02 PM
      I'm not saying you can't sign in with a name other than your own. I'm talking about one person having multiple accounts (alts). I think one account, ~{Jaded}~, from my IP is enough. It's obviously NOT my real name but I really have no need to have multiple accounts to sign into Tribe. This multiple trollish "alt" phenomenon started with places like Yahoo chat, MSN chat...so on and yes, I was guilty back in those days of having multiple identities (all based on 1 email address, though), but for Tribe's problem's such as Grundig, et al, and others who keep logging back in with new alts I think the IP based sign-in would solve lots of problems.
      • Unsu...
         

        Re: Here's a novel idea..

        Sat, February 23, 2008 - 3:27 PM
        If there was only ONE problem maker, that would be relatively easy to sort out. And it would have to be someone everyone considered a problem. That is not the case. There are a bunch of people that get away with things that other people couldn't get away with.

        Justice may be blind, but the system that exists around it is not and it highly favors certain people.

        Likewise, people seek scapegoats to say "THAT is the problem, THOSE people" while denying their own participation in the activities. While never realizing that they, themselves, do virtually the identical thing using different words.

        The problem with booting people is that even if those people went away and stayed away, other people's behavior would become more identifiable and observable as being similar. Kick off those people, and the next group that wasn't noticed will be a glaring example of trolling or hypocrisy. Why? Because we all do it.

        We all make snotty remarks once in a while. And if you happen to be the focus of a group of people, you will obviously be making a lot more snotty remarks, because you have umpteen dozen people making those snotty remarks to you. Right?

        Twelve against one is hardly fair. But that kind of thing happens with regularity on Tribe.net. A cohesive group will shoot down a particular individual. If that individual responds to each and every person, guess who gets in trouble? Not the group. They only picked on that individual twice each, let's say. If the individual responds to each poke, that's twenty-four responses. And then what does it look like? That the one individual is stirring up shit, because they responded to all of the group.

        But do those twelve people who each made two comments get booted? No. Why not? Do you see what I am saying?

        There's always more to it than what meets the eye.
    • Re: Here's a novel idea..

      Sun, February 24, 2008 - 3:36 AM
      Face Book is also a great big Data mining project funded by the FBI.

      Do the math.

      Why create database records about peoples contacts, activities, business associates, friends, work history, etc etc, when they will WILLINGLY spill their guts to fill in the blanks for you?

      --S
      • Unsu...
         

        Re: Here's a novel idea..

        Sun, February 24, 2008 - 7:38 AM
        "Face Book is also a great big Data mining project funded by the FBI.

        Do the math.

        Why create database records about peoples contacts, activities, business associates, friends, work history, etc etc, when they will WILLINGLY spill their guts to fill in the blanks for you?

        --S "

        _____________

        I suppose, but my impression of the FBI is that they can't even get the job done investigating known criminals who have confessed, under oath, to committing serious felonies. You can hand deliverer to the FBI a sworn affidavit or court testimony under oath in which someone confesses to a serious federal offense, and chances are good they will not do anything with it. No joke.

        I don't know what they do with their time or what their priorities are, but they leave a lot on the table. I suspect they are simply swamped and overloaded.

        Given that, how do they have time to process data mined from facebook, and to what purpose?
        • Re: Here's a novel idea..

          Sun, February 24, 2008 - 9:34 AM
          OOOOOooo I have an answer for that one....The FBI are forever vigilent to rid this world of those internet child predators. They love doing that. Personally, I think they like reading the chat that goes on...but hey, whatever floats your boat.

          Stop giggling, Shatter. I know, you are completely aware of "who" I'm talking about on this one. <wink>
        • Re: Here's a novel idea..

          Sun, February 24, 2008 - 12:18 PM
          I know with the utmost certainty, that 85% of all FBI (and the other TLS's) resources are dedicated to tracking down child molesters and child pornographers as far as their computer crimes division is concerned.

          The big problem is data generation.

          Now, the FBI may have seeded Face Book Inc. (COMMON, look at the initials) but I'm betting other places like the NSA and SS would enjoy the benefits. It's a system where you don't need researchers to do your work. Carnivore doesn't have to parse anything, every user is hdoing it for you.

          Now, unlike other tin foil hat wearing people, and the crap spouted off, this is all very real. Does the FBI have nefarious intent for this data? No, I don't believe s for one moment. i do believe that they feel it will help them catch bad guys sooner than later, and give them and AMAZING paper trail of evidence for open shut cases, because all the information could be entered as confession, if I'm not mistaken.

          However, that doesn't mean I think it's right to set up something like this.

          With your example about FBI bog load, I'm suspect most of the cases that they don't convict are form some stupid technicality or procedural mistake.

          As for time to data mine, it's easy. They start with an IP and run a search. See who all has had this IP. Check the time logs for the IP lease with the ISP. Don't even need a search warrent for that, it's all very routine. See who was using it at the time and see if they have a facebook account. Take a look at recent activity and who they are connected to.. etc etc.

          Normally, all of this would require a stake out. Follow the suspect, see who they talk to, take pictures, process, build a dossier. Social networks d it for you. You are building a publicly accessible dossier on yourself at all times. All one would need was a superuser admin account to get to the information that isn't public.

          Now, with the detail of questions face book asks you, it's like getting the 3rd degree.

          --S
  • Re: Here's a novel idea..

    Sat, February 23, 2008 - 3:32 PM
    I really wish I could have multiple alts using one email address. why? so that I can separate an alt from my work and private personas.
    • Unsu...
       

      Re: Here's a novel idea..

      Sat, February 23, 2008 - 3:44 PM
      Isara, I think that was discussed at one time. About having a Master screen name and a couple of additional names under the same Master account. Sort of like how AOL is set up.

      You could have your Master name, and only use the two additional names in public, one for work, one for private, and be able to change, alter, or delete those extra ones, without it affecting your Master name. And all your notifications could be CCed to your Master name email.
  • Re: Here's a novel idea..

    Sat, February 23, 2008 - 5:13 PM
    <<Could they not limit someone to just one login based on IP?>>

    Even if they could, how would that be fair? When I had a roommate we were both on Tribe as well as her sister who was at our house day and night. We all logged onto the same desk top to get on tribe. Limiting access by IP addresses wouldn't have worked for us at all.
    • Re: Here's a novel idea..

      Sat, February 23, 2008 - 5:23 PM
      My roommate and I share the same internet connection, two computers, plus I have a laptop....but our IP is not always the same IP.

      Anyway, I don't understand the need for multiple identities on ONE website...I stopped doing that when I matured (turns and looks at roommate). I think those who want to whine, snivel, complain, and try to get others in trouble do so under that pseudonem hoping they can remain undiscovered. Thing is, most of us have a very distinct writing style and whether our name is Prissy Miss or Mogilla Gorilla, we will tend to write in the same style. Trying to hide through these alts are futile, at best and senseless, IMHO.
      • Re: Here's a novel idea..

        Sat, February 23, 2008 - 5:31 PM
        <<My roommate and I share the same internet connection, two computers, plus I have a laptop....but our IP is not always the same IP.



        Not always the same IP, but does that means sometimes it is? What about if you only shared one computer like many couples do?

        <<Anyway, I don't understand the need for multiple identities on ONE website...I stopped doing that when I matured>>

        Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean that others don't have a need for it. Some people like to have some privacy from co-workers or family when they post in certain tribes. Maybe you don't have that need but there isn't any reason not to respect that some people do.
        • Re: Here's a novel idea..

          Sat, February 23, 2008 - 5:44 PM
          by signing into Tribe as ~{Jaded}~ no one in my family nor my coworkers know who I am. Only those who I choose to let in on my identity know who "jaded" is. Also, I don't access Tribe at work, I have too much actual work to do there to surf Tribe.
          • Re: Here's a novel idea..

            Sat, February 23, 2008 - 5:45 PM
            That is great, you have it all figured out for YOU but different people have different needs and what works for you doesn't always work for others. And there are people who have fun alts that are harmless. Just because you are too mature for it doesn't mean that it isn't fun and harmless for someone else.
        • Re: Here's a novel idea..

          Sat, February 23, 2008 - 5:47 PM
          One of the problems is that most providers use Dynamic IP's. A Static IP can be blocked, but a Dynamic IP changes from time to time. They exist in a pool that randomly gets assigned to user who request them by logging on and entering the net, to be short. SO you and your neighbor can end up using the same IP from day to day, or it can even shift around a city. Depends on how the Provider is configured. So We could end up blocking an IP and block our friend down the street, inadvertently.
          • Re: Here's a novel idea..

            Sat, February 23, 2008 - 9:38 PM
            >> A Static IP can be blocked, but a Dynamic IP changes from time to time. <<

            sorry for parroting this post.

            one thing that I'd like to point out, when I first joined it was the alts that made tribe fun. alot of people run alt accounts that aren't involved in stirring up problems and harassing tribes. for instance, Madame Gonzaga, Inferno, Potototo and Talky Tina were four alts that kept me hooked to tribe. none of them participated in maliciousness. many of us are not looking for some online community experience and tribe shouldn't aspire to be another Facebook. it will only succeed if it continues to be different.

            the rules defined by TOU work. as long as they are enforced. community works as long as we look out for each other. if someone is being harassed or worse, then it is the responsibility of tribe moderators to do something. easy. this is the world we make and it is kind of up to us to keep things civil. rather than incessantly whining to the TOU guy, we need to step up and protect each other.

            and as far as the worst trolls. if they keep to themselves, leave them the Hell alone. they obviously have their friends and there is no reason why they need to be denied each other's friendship.
  • Unsu...
     

    Re: Here's a novel idea..

    Sat, February 23, 2008 - 5:42 PM
    The underlying assumption in this thread is that multiple alts are the root of all mischief on Tribe.net.

    I don't think so. While they can be and are often used for mischief or cowardly deeds, they are but a tool, and not the source of such conduct.

    I once had a lot of fun creating different characters or alts, and did so for a few years. I did not get into any trouble with the TOU GUY for it, either.

    So to the extent anyone thinks that getting rid of mulitple alts would get rid of gadflies like me, you are mistaken. While I do appear here as an alt, this is my only account.

    Tolerance for alts is part of what made Tribe.net unique and fun. Many people used that tolerance to create lots of funny and interesting characters through their multiple alts. And it could be fun trying to figure out whose alt was who.

    Tribe is a lot less fun these days, for various reasons, including the crack down on alts and crack down on fun, in general.

    There has always been a contingent of people here who abhor alts (even while guarding their own identities) and constantly bitch about them. These people make tribe less fun. They seem to want to make tribe more like myspace or facebook. Why? Go there if that is what you want.
    • Re: Here's a novel idea..

      Sat, February 23, 2008 - 5:48 PM
      <Tolerance for alts is part of what made Tribe.net unique and fun.>

      Yahoo has done it for years.

      <They seem to want to make tribe more like myspace or facebook. Why? Go there if that is what you want.>

      I have gone to both, don't like them, but I still have only one login at Tribe and it will remain that way. You still don't know who I am...with this 1 "alt", since Jaded is not my real name.
      • Re: Here's a novel idea..

        Sat, February 23, 2008 - 6:54 PM
        That brings up another good point.

        Yahoo, while largely a free service, also allows people to make new accounts willy-nilly, relying solely on reports to them for enforcement of TOU. By operating the same way as a large, well-established internet company, I submit that tribe conducts itself largely the same way,a nd expecting otherwise with the free service is going beyond the expectations typical of any service provider. Check out the Yahoo Answers feedback board sometime. TONS of people complaining they they were kicked off with no warning, for no reason.

        I agree, the refund policy should be addressed, but as regards removals, why would tribe be able now (when it never has been before) to provide a better alternative means of member control and discipline than a multi-million dollar company? I mean, if there's something easy and superior they could do, maybe they could attract some users with it, but I'm not seeing how they could. I'm not even sure how they could have back in the heydey of three years ago. We'd all like it, because I think we all prefer things to be as fair as possible, but no one else is operating a service that way. This isn't an apology, just some comparison shopping, and posing the question: How could tribe realistically break with not just accepted practice but with what has become expected practice netwide, and pull off this seemingly revolutionary concept of fairness in unsubbing that everyone is so hot for? What am I missing that says this could be done? An unsub will always be subjective, and any given unsubbee can always cry foul, no matter how open-minded and well-researched the unsubber pulling the trigger has been (or thinks they have been).

        I like the notion of sticking to the subject of creating a viable refund policy and offering it up to Tribe. Please offer a counter view, but I don't see how anything can be done to prevent the process from being report-based and subjective as it with any company, and as such open to unfair emotionality. If you really can resolve this issue, it seems to me you'd be breaking the kind of ground that even the giants have failed to approach. But by all means, brainstorm it if you feel you are on to something. Maybe you are and everyone else should take notice.
        • Unsu...
           

          Re: Here's a novel idea..

          Sat, February 23, 2008 - 11:04 PM
          Rodney Springgun wrote:

          "Please offer a counter view, but I don't see how anything can be done to prevent the process from being report-based and subjective as it with any company, and as such open to unfair emotionality. If you really can resolve this issue, it seems to me you'd be breaking the kind of ground that even the giants have failed to approach. But by all means, brainstorm it if you feel you are on to something. Maybe you are and everyone else should take notice."

          ______________

          The whole industry is this way, you say?

          I contend the whole industry has been duped by some silicon valley lawyers. All of these TOU were written by a bunch of west coast "intellectual property" transactional lawyers who had never been anywhere near a courtroom and who had no grasp of the realities of tort litigation, but who infused the entire internet social network industry with the paranoid and fearful notion that they had to respond to customer complaints about other customers by unsubbing or other drastic actions, lest they face some terrible horrible and potentially ruinous vicarious liability.

          Much if not all of TOU activity on websites is driven by this deep seated paranoid fear of litigation, I think.

          In reality, there is no practical legal liability going on for social network websites for allowing members to troll the shit out of each other, annoy each other, call each other names, drive each other to distraction, hurt each others feelings, etc.

          The truly libelous or criminal actions that would warrant action by a website are rare and easy to spot. 99% of the complaints and unsubbings are about stuff that comes nowhere near to that.

          So, once you take that out of the equation, why do social networking websites devote precious resources to pandering to the complaints and whining of various members about other members?

          It's hard to say. Given how badly it is administered at a place like Tribe, it hardly does anything to engender customer satisfaction or add value.

          Why not just let members fend for themselves? Why pander to all this petty, grade school type of whining and snitching?

          The unsubbing is a mystery, to me. I mean, if I am so bad, awful and a threat to the company and all of civilization, as some of you argue that my frequent unsubbing proves, then doesn't that demand that tribe.net do more than just unsub me? They know I can come back and often do. Shouldn't they do more, like send me a warning that I am banned and that they will take legal action against me if I return? I mean, how can just unsubbing me be an adequate response if I pose some threat like some of you retards claim I do? Why, it's outright negligent of them not to do more!

          But they don't do squat. They just unsub when someone whines a bunch. It's like dealing with a robot, I swear.

          LOL!

          Not only do they never say a damn word to me, but they actually allowed me to set up a premium account, with full knowledge of who I am, and they let me keep it for a month. That either proves they really have no idea of what the hell they are doing, or they were just out to scam me out of $40. And before y'all giggle at that one and congratulate the staff for their con, do you really admire and want to keep company with grifters who work for a $40 scam? Pathetic. Even crack whores have more pride than that.

          There's no rhyme or reason to what they do. It blows my mind that none of you can see that, or think that there is no other way.

          Tribe has admitted it isn't going to make the big time. They concede their goal is no longer to be a big network. Well, I got news for them. If they are going to make it as a small business, they are going to have to provide excellent customer service. And this TOU business ain't that.
  • Re: Here's a novel idea..

    Sat, February 23, 2008 - 9:24 PM
    >> Could they not limit someone to just one login based on IP? <<

    no. the majority of us don't have a static IP address. read up on DHCP.

    the best you could do would be to limit users based on MAC address. but people with more than one computer would get around it. and what about couples that have two accounts? or say several people that share a connection in a building?

    if you really want to cut down on the nonsense, you could force all accounts to say pay some nominal amount for each profile. that way you could theoretically authenticate users to some degree. of course, people with shitty credit and no bank account would be pushed off tribe.
  • Re: Here's a novel idea..

    Sun, February 24, 2008 - 2:22 AM
    OK, here's some technical and policy stuff that I've encountered in the past. I've run an online site (a game site) for over a decade. In doing so, I've had the opportunity to deal with a *lot* of abusers from all over the world. You'd be surprised at how many sheer jackasses play backgammon. Well, OK, you might not.

    No, you can't just allow one account per IP. Often, multiple people share an IP address... sometimes they even share a computer. What happens when two people in my office want to sign into Tribe? We all come out via the same IP address, so it's impossible to know if it's one person or 100 creating accounts. There are similar scenarios around AOL, coffee shops, schools, mobile devices, visiting a friend, etc. IP addresses are starting to become a scarce resource, and sharing them is more common every day.

    Similarly, an individual's IP often changes. I routinely log into Tribe from home, my office, hotels, friends' houses, and my mobile phone. Some of my IPs (work, home) are static, but others change on a regular basis. Dialup is becoming increasingly rare, but people on dialup usually get a new address with every connection. Sometimes DSL/cable addresses change regularly, and sometimes they stay relatively fixed. Many people have multiple methods of connecting to the net, so if one route gets shut down another can just take its place.

    In short, there is no reliable way of mapping an individual to an IP address, and an IP address to an individual.

    There are plenty of legitimate reasons to have multiple accounts. One might want to keep one's professional profile separate from their kinky one. They might create a "role account" that is shared among 2-3 people if they want to share moderator duties for a tribe. Shatter's Bondage a Go Go alt is an excellent example of a legitimate alt-- the club has its own account, friends, etc.

    Having said that, on my backgammon server I have a "notify me" list of hostnames and IP addresses. If someone creates a new account from an address on the watch list, I go check it out manually to see if I can identify the creator as a known troublemaker. That person usually winds on a "watch this guy more closely" list for a while. This takes manual effort, and doesn't scale well, but it can be a useful tool.
    • Re: Here's a novel idea..

      Sun, February 24, 2008 - 2:54 AM
      >> Having said that, on my backgammon server I have a "notify me" list of hostnames and IP addresses. <<

      wouldn't it generate too many false positives to be of any practical use? I'm asking out of curiosity.
      • Unsu...
         

        Re: Here's a novel idea..

        Sun, February 24, 2008 - 7:35 AM
        Rod, lying, wrote asked in response to:

        >> Having said that, on my backgammon server I have a "notify me" list of hostnames and IP addresses. <<

        wouldn't it generate too many false positives to be of any practical use? I'm asking out of curiosity? "

        ___________

        Son, you don't ask out of idle curiosity. You ask out of concern about your own IP address being linked to some abuse. How many alts do you have?
        • Re: Here's a novel idea..

          Sun, February 24, 2008 - 3:21 PM
          >> You ask out of concern about your own IP address being linked to some abuse. <<

          well... no. In fact I wish there was a way to definitively demonstrate that you and your cohorts are full of shit as far as your incessant accusations and lies about "Rod" and his thousand alts. but true to form it always has to return to vague accusations repeated incessantly all over tribe. but it is becoming increasingly clear that you've gone to the well one too many times and pretty every one else outside your insane litte clique realizes that you're not worth the time of day.

          the problem has nothing to do with alts. the problem has everything to do with one or two deranged weirdos screwing it up for the rest of us. and it just keeps repeating itself. there will be a tribe with several active threads. you join. all the previous threads are abandoned and all content becomes focused on one or two threads you create. half the posts come from you. another quarter from your "friends." and the remaining posts are limited to the members that are now enmeshed in responding to your negative, weird bullshit.

          and here we are... the buds of an interesting thread nipped by you yet again because you had to insinuate yourself. it wasn't about you and you can't tolerate that. god forbid others enjoy themselves. the only solution I've found to your insanity is to boot you and convert the tribes I moderate to moderated or private status. but I guess you take pride in being a nuisance.
          • Unsu...
             

            Re: Here's a novel idea..

            Mon, February 25, 2008 - 10:37 PM
            Rodney Spring** wrote:

            "In fact I wish there was a way to definitively demonstrate that you and your cohorts are full of shit as far as your incessant accusations and lies about "Rod" and his thousand alts."

            ________

            First step would be to simply deny the allegations, which you never do. Instead, you respond by trolling. sending in the attack alts and ultimately having bystanders unsubbed.

            You are a nut. You and your lady friend had me unsubbed over allegations raised by an entirely different person. You never denied the allegations or even confronted the person who raised them. Instead, the two of you delcared war on me - a bystander - and demanded that I retract the allegations spoken by another person (huh?) and complained so much to the TOU GUY that I was eventually unsubbed just to shut you up.

            Being here and meeting people like you is like visiting a mental institution. This whole place is surreal.
            • Re: Here's a novel idea..

              Mon, February 25, 2008 - 10:45 PM
              "Being here and meeting people like you is like visiting a mental institution. This whole place is surreal."

              Then why, oh WHY, do you keep coming back?
              Do you really have so very little going on in your life that you must continually go on like this?
              Honestly - why do you keep coming back? Why can't you just walk away and be done with tribe?
              • Unsu...
                 

                Re: Here's a novel idea..

                Mon, February 25, 2008 - 10:58 PM
                "Honestly - why do you keep coming back? Why can't you just walk away and be done with tribe?"
                _____________

                Because it is like a train wreck. You know you should look away, but you can't.
                • Re: Here's a novel idea..

                  Mon, February 25, 2008 - 11:13 PM
                  Oh, I see.
                  Have you considered maybe just watching the train wreck? Is it impossible for you to just watch and not comment?
                  Too bad the digest function seems to be out of order, or you could watch the train wreck that way, without making all the comments and infuriating others that are actually here because they enjoy it.

                  You see, sir, you sort of bring the mood whole party down. I have observed you in other tribes and at times you can be quite funny, charming even, but for the most part, you've become a draggy bummer and I'd really like to see you free yourself (and the rest of us) from your misery and despair.
                  Please?
                  Watching the train wreck does have a certain morbid appeal, but couldn't you just rest easier at night knowing it's happening? Do you really have to see it and perpetuate it?

                  Sincerely,
                  : D
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.