There are certain factual errors in your statement:

"canceling the accounts, but not issuing even so much as a prorated refund."
- We (NSA) have generally issued refunds on request. if a paid subscriber was unsubscribed during their paid period, it is our policy to issue a full refund of their last payment and we have done so for those cases where we (NSA) have accepted the cost of making good on USN's commitments, though we do so at our sole discretion. We have restored a number of profiles that were unsubscribed under contentious circumstances and in those cases where the subscriber was a paid member, we have extended their subscription period.

" yet you have no intention of enforcing it anymore"
- We (NSA) have never stated anywhere that we have "no intention of enforcing" the TOU or the CoC: to the contrary we have adopted consistent and fair standards for enforcement and we enforce to those standards whenever applicable situations are brought to our attention. We (NSA) have intervened many times to settle disputes and do so on a regular basis. While these standards are stated in more detail elsewhere, in general the rules are that:

Moderators have the privilege, right, and responsibility to set the tone and standards for their tribes and Tribe will not intervene except at the request of the moderator. Should a user find the tenor of a tribe unacceptable and the moderator unresponsive to their concerns, they are free to leave that tribe or create their own and moderate it to their own standards.

We encourage users to make use of the privacy tools we offer within the system to mitigate problem users. Where those tools fail, we intervene. Note that occasionally disputes rise to the level of possible criminal behavior and in those cases we work with the victim to engage law enforcement and to preserve evidence which may give the impression that no action has been taken, but rest assured the situation is being actively responded to.

As the TOU speaks only to those circumstances where Tribe might take action against the user agreeing to the TOU and not at all to actions Tribe might take on behalf of the user against other users, it seems counterintuitive that a person would complain about not being unsubbed in such circumstances as they think they have taken an action that would merit being unsubbed under the terms where we have reserved the right to do so.

If your intent is to suggest that it would be misleading to a user who feels that another user has, in their opinion, violated the TOU or CoC and that they believe that the other user should therefore be unsubscribed for doing so then, aside from the first user having assumed a vigilante mantle of judge and jury, they might refer to paragraph 16 of the TOU: "Without limiting the foregoing, you specifically acknowledge that Tribe is not liable for the defamatory, offensive, infringing, breaching, fraudulent, or illegal conduct of other users or third parties and that the risk of injury from the foregoing rests entirely with you."

I did not delete any of the threads to which you refer, nor did I request or even suggest that they be deleted.

I wish they would be restored, as evidence that I am being stalked.