Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

topic posted Thu, March 27, 2008 - 12:13 PM by  Darren
I have been pondering deleting the Brainstorm tribe over the past few weeks. I spend a lot more of my time on the Gold Star tribe, and they drive new development a lot better than this tribe. I have been extremely frustrated by reading this tribe and the number of off-topic comments, subjects not related to brainstorming, and the general uselessness of this tribe -- the majority of the people just want the bugs fixed, and I am not going to be able to do much in the way of development since I'm almost finished implementing the projects that were 95% to 99% finished when I took over.

I am going to allow comments on this subject for about a week. If nobody has a truly compelling argument for me, this tribe is history.
posted by:
Darren
SF Bay Area
  • Unsu...
     

    Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

    Thu, March 27, 2008 - 12:20 PM
    There's a good chance that if you delete this tribe I will delete my account/membership! No reason to delete this tribe. All sounds rather odd to me. And all this comes a couple of months before I was going to go gold.
    • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

      Thu, March 27, 2008 - 12:25 PM
      This isn't a really compelling argument for me. Next!
      • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

        Thu, March 27, 2008 - 12:41 PM
        I feel like you are stating that only Premium members are worth listening to.

        I really enjoy the brainstorming tribe.. expecially when people stick to the topics. The problem is, you never visit this tribe. So people feel like it's a waste of time. I feel that if you gave this tribe some attention, people may post more. I know, you don't have much time to give. But it seems to me that the gold star tribe is for all the premium members updates on special services, no?

        Furthermore, do you really want all of these members in the Gold Star tribe? ALLL of these threads and complaints clogging up your premium member tribe?
        • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

          Thu, March 27, 2008 - 12:45 PM
          1) This tribe is a pain to read, mostly because it almost invariably veers from useful information to complaints and ridiculous trolling.
          2) Premium members actually seem less likely to act up in this manner, so yes I like talking to them more.
          3) If some of you actually put your money where your mouth is, yes, I would love to see you on the Gold Star Tribe.

          Again, not compelling. Next.
          • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

            Thu, March 27, 2008 - 12:53 PM
            well, I agree that this tribe is really not doing what's intended, and that's got to be incredibly frustrating. It does hurt to be lumped in with the "acting up" crowd, as I'm pretty careful not to do that. It also seems unfair to offer paying and non-paying memberships, but the non-paying members are not allowed to have a voice about anything.

            On the other hand, it's hard for a rational voice to be heard out of this tribe, surrounded by flames, mud, and general asshattery. And it's not like another tribe could be stared, because the jerkwads would just go over there and make a mess too.

            So I guess I support you either way - I hate to see this tribe go, but I also hate seeing what it's become.
            • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

              Thu, March 27, 2008 - 1:10 PM
              i think it should stay put for this reason:

              members actually do help other members with functionality problems in here

              a lot of what people post about is a user problem rather than a tribe problem,
              and this is a good place to deal with those issues.


              also, i can forsee your inbox becoming the replacement for a lot
              of what goes on in here and i'm sure you don't want that.
              • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

                Thu, March 27, 2008 - 6:58 PM
                I'm just going to pipe up and agree with the previous two posts on this thread.

                As much as I hate this Tribe now, even though it's not useful for you, it can be useful for other people. It does need active moderating, however. What if you gave it over to someone else to manage the mud and flamers?
                • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

                  Thu, March 27, 2008 - 8:10 PM
                  now that i'm tribing while not busy doing 50 other things, i realize i had my
                  tribes crossed. this ain't the bugs tribe.

                  whoops, sorry.

                  and now i can't come up with a good reason not to nuke it.

                  maybe Patti would take it over for you.
          • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

            Fri, March 28, 2008 - 11:46 AM
            Darren, I sure understand your frustration and thinking. However, you're essentially telling the largest block of users, the ones that haven't yet converted to premium membership and drive traffic, to go take a flying leap because you can't be bothered with moderating a very useful tribe. Especially during tough economic times. Some, like myself, just can't afford it....just at this moment. And I'm not alone. You're willing to tell folks that are at the tipping point of conversion to, essentially, go fuck themselves? Sounds like a really bad setup, don't it?

            Besides, there's something to be said that the current conditions of this tribe are a direct result of tribe's inability to manage itself. Everyone is frustrated and it comes out here. But now you're saying it's too frustrating? That's like a man saying he's bored with his wife's attitude problems even though he drinks, sleeps around and ignores the kids.

            And when the Gold Star Tribe gets frustrated with tribe's typically slow or seemingly unresponsive and long development process - no personal offense intended, just voicing the tone around this domain - will you bore of them and delete that tribe too? Care for users much? That's the attitude that comes across from this grand scheme of deleting brainstorm. Not exactly inspiring confidence and violates the credo of net business...don't be a dick. Deleting brainstorm because you're personally bored with it is a dickish move.

            Even less inspiring, how come we have to point these very obvious things out? It's enough to make some wonder, "What kind of unscrupulous cons run this place and why should they be given our credit card info?"

            Please don't get me wrong. I totally appreciate your position, frustrations and understand you don't have the time to moderate and sift through the criticisms and that it's really, REALLY depressing at times. Like you, I'd rather have you doing development stuff and being all happy with your job. Then why not have someone else moderate Brainstorm?

            I gotta tell ya, you're going to lose a lot more users if you delete this tribe. Lots more. Mass-exodus more. As in losing bankable potential income to develop tribe even more. Them and the 10-300 people each of them are friends with. That's a lot of alienation for such little output of simple moderation of a tribe. And product viability is directly proportional to the breadth of user base and marketable reputation.

            I hope you reconsider.
      • Unsu...
         

        Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

        Thu, March 27, 2008 - 1:05 PM
        "This isn't a really compelling argument for me. Next!"

        Well Darren even though you're seemingly a good egg your flippancy speaks volumes unlike the sound module! LOL

        Anyway I might be off pretty soon. So good luck. ROFLMOL
    • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

      Thu, March 27, 2008 - 1:07 PM
      Oh dear. Patrick is going to unsubscribe. Are you *trying* to get him to delete the tribe?

      However Darren, if you delete this tribe that calls in to question the often debated "how do we delete tribes"/"you can't" dictum. Just my .02
      • Unsu...
         

        Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

        Thu, March 27, 2008 - 1:28 PM
        It's like the erosion of the past because it hinders the process of making money. Tribe has gone down the hole of...

        Nothing to do with knowledge as “memory” is good as the most important, most compelling, arguments will always remain. The meme of love will win because it is the progenitor.
  • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

    Thu, March 27, 2008 - 1:27 PM
    I think it would be a mistake, if only for the perception of what deleting would do. Yes, this tribe has become a wasteland of whining, and the paying members tribe(s) are certainly more useful. But considering that a big concern that tribe users have had is that tribe is not being responsive to users, to say that you're going to shut down a tribe that was created specifically to act as a conduit to tribe would send out a bad message.

    And perception is important here, whether you like to admit it or not.

    Here's what I would do if I were you:

    1) stop reading this tribe. Remain a member, but pretty much ignore it.
    2) pick one or two trusted folks in the tribe who will alert you to the one or two interesting points that are made per week, so that you can respond to them.

    Right now tribe is fighting a public relations problem of not being responsive. That's a legitimate issue, in that you're the only one out there and there's only so much you can do, so paying attention to bickering is a time waster.

    My frustration with Tribe The Business at the moment is that it's not taking advantage of its membership base. This is a great opportunity for you to use one or more of the half-dozen or so reasonable people who would immediately volunteer to be a liasion between you and the membership, to get questions answered, while freeing up you valuable time to getting stuff done.
  • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

    Thu, March 27, 2008 - 1:35 PM
    It would be great, for historical reasons, to be able to make a tribe 'read-only'. Thus retiring it, instead of deleting it, and retaining it's data for later edification.. :)

    peace
    -cpr
    • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

      Thu, March 27, 2008 - 2:21 PM
      Sometimes the most interesting things that occur and that are discussed in various tribes have nothing to do with the original intention or topic of the tribe.

      Deleting stuff is in almost everycase a bad idea IMO. After humanity is extinct, the alien excavators will have trouble deciphering all of the omissions in our digital history.

      ~V~
  • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

    Thu, March 27, 2008 - 2:56 PM
    Darren,

    Deleting this tribe would be like a bratty kid taking his ball and going home.

    I say, let it stay. It's not really taking up that much memory on your precious server, is it?
    • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

      Thu, March 27, 2008 - 4:16 PM
      It does imply an obligation, then left unfulfilled, that the tribe.net management is reading this page.


      Darren, have you ever heard of The Well? www.well.com


      An old, old, amazingly-still-alive site filled with some of the very same issues as this space. One of the things that 'the well' has is an entire section called metawell, where discussions ABOUT the well are hosted.

      ;-b
  • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

    Thu, March 27, 2008 - 4:25 PM
    The best performance feedback you've received recently has come from a non-premium member. After pouring my energy into Tribe for the three years that I worked there, I feel like I've made more than sufficient contributions to the site so I'll never be a premium member. (Translation: if you delete this tribe, it hurts me personally. Yes, I'm selfish.)

    In all seriousness, deleting the brainstorm tribe would be sending a bad message to the users: "Your input is worthless unless you're willing to pay for membership." Even if that isn't truly the case, it sends a really bad message to new members and old members who aren't able to buy memberships.

    As someone has pointed out, members do help each other out in this tribe.

    Might I recommend a better strategy for you? You can probably gather 99% of the useful information that would be useful to you by reading only the initial message in each thread, or perhaps the initial message and the first couple of followups. Occasionally a thread may be worth reading beyond that point, but those will probably make themselves readily apparent.

    And trust me, I completely understand your frustration with the member base and the typical content of tribes like this. I've spent way more time dealing with it than you have.
    • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

      Thu, March 27, 2008 - 5:35 PM
      P.S. Two additional points. (1) Most suggestions are going to be crap, regardless of whether they come from regular or premium members. (2) Good ideas can come from anywhere, and may well be hiding under a really obnoxious whine.
  • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

    Thu, March 27, 2008 - 7:41 PM
    Once upon a time it was suggested to turn this tribe over to someone else with the time available to actively moderate it, which is what it takes. That's still an option. That person could act as a conduit to you, or whoever else is around after all this crap drives you to the funny farm. ;)

    Assuming there's anybody left who cares.
  • Unsu...
     

    Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

    Thu, March 27, 2008 - 9:09 PM
    Indeed! So Darren is being a cunt!! I'll mod this tribe but deleting it is against the whole tribe ethic. Regardless of other issues in my life at present if tribe becomes blassay then fuck it. Darren is not the Daddy and if he's getting power pissed then that his own shit to deal with.

    Looking for another network so please advise peeps.

    Yeah this place is losing the fucking love!

    LOVE

    LOVE

    FUCK

    LOVE

    FUCKING

    LOVE

    LOVE

    FUCK

    FUCK

    LOVE

    LOVE

    LOVE
    LOVE
    • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

      Thu, March 27, 2008 - 9:13 PM
      I don't think that helped much. LOL

      I was thinking maybe Bloke or Deia as moderator. Somebody who is actually moderate. :)
      • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

        Thu, March 27, 2008 - 9:26 PM
        either of them would be great...you yourself would be pretty good too ;)
        • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

          Thu, March 27, 2008 - 10:02 PM
          i'm thinking someone with actual connections to Tribe with
          knowlege of how it functions

          or none at all.
          • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

            Thu, March 27, 2008 - 10:16 PM
            Or maybe someone with an actual connection to someone with an actual connection to tribe and how it functions?

            As frustrating as this tribe can be, I think that it is beneficial on certain levels. I can totally see why you would want to flush this tribe, Darren, but I can't see how that action would be beneficial to tribe as a whole.

            Perhaps we could try a different moderator that has more time to deal with the BS quotient, also someone that could alert you to actual brainstorms that might be worth considering. This might allow you a wee bit more time to deal with keeping the site up and running, which would be the most beneficial option for us all.

            : D
  • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

    Fri, March 28, 2008 - 3:05 AM
    I've read most of the responses and I have to agree with most that you shouldn't delete simply because a good idea might come from "anywhere".

    The problem here is that this tribe isn't being "moderated" and I don't believe you have the time to sift through the bullshit that seems to be prevelant in here these days. I'm sure you've plenty to do here without having to read what seems to be mostly trollish and off topic posts lately.

    A second problem is that a lot of threads are "bug" threads and not "idea" threads. Those need to deleted and the poster sent a link to the bugs tribe (falls under moderation which one needs time to do).

    I propose three changes;

    1. Take this off the "Official Tribe" list.

    2. Make it an "Unofficial" Official Tribe.

    3. Turn over moderatorship to Patti (if she'll have it) for the following reasons:

    a. She's unlikely to put up with the waste of bandwidth that seems to be going on lately.
    b. She's here a lot, seems to have the time and has stated her feelings for this tribe.
    c. She has inside technical knowledge that she might be able to educate us and help us understand why an "obiviously great idea" can/can't be implemented.
    d. She's *not* a premium member (credibility).

    Maybe she (or someone else) can send you a weekly, monthly, etc. PM with the best ideas that are gleened from this tribe.

    What say you Patti? Darren?
    • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

      Fri, March 28, 2008 - 3:10 AM
      >> What say you Patti? Darren? <<

      Anyone else?
      • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

        Fri, March 28, 2008 - 2:14 PM
        Yeah, I'd do it. I'm not afraid to be "cranky". Personally, my platform is to remove the bozos, appropriately channel off topic comments, and to make this tribe about brainstorming interesting or helpful features to the tribe community, not tribesturming by the introlligentcia. Tribe obviously needs some input from the folks who aren't premium members, as has been pointed out by others, a position I happen to agree with. I don't happen to be a premium member at the moment so I'd have slightly more cred with other non-premium members...yet some of my best tribe buds are premium members.

        Darren, while I support your efforts to satisfy and add value to paying members, it is clear (or soon will be) that paying members don't live in the same feature "territory" as non-paying members. Since at least some folks, potential paying members, are unlikely to sigh up for a paid membership without at least a day or two experience as a non-paying member, it's probably wise to continue to listen to feature requests and discussions from non-paying tribe members about what they'd like to see happen with tribe's feature evolution. I'm not saying you're planning on ignoring us...just that this particular tribe, up till now, has been a manifest attempt to do so, to listen to all of us...up until the paying membership feature was well underway.

        Oh, it certainly would be the ultimate irony if this tribe was closed and deleted because of tiering having gained economic moment...but then, you have been honest about thinking about taking that action...which in and of itself is quite refreshing.
    • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

      Fri, March 28, 2008 - 3:16 AM
      Brilliant. Best use of a brainstorming session I've seen in months.

      This, I think, would be a good candidate for that compelling argument you wanted, Darren...
      • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

        Fri, March 28, 2008 - 5:40 AM
        Here here Mystic. VERY well put!!

        Not to mention.. I strolled over to the Gold Star tribe, and no offense to any premium members, but many of the topics appear to be VERY similar to this tribe. Only difference, most of the users own a star. But it still seems you are getting complaints, questions and off topic threads just like in here
    • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

      Fri, March 28, 2008 - 5:48 AM
      If nominated, I will not run. If elected, I will not serve.

      Sorry, but this is one that I'm just not willing to sign up for. While I worked at Tribe, I had a certain personal ethic when mixing it up on the site: always be polite and courteous to the users, no matter how much of clueless fucking assholes they were. Never flame. Always be helpful. If you look back through my history, I'm pretty sure that you'll find I did an exemplary job of it.

      However, it took way too much tongue-biting and screaming at monitors to make it work. I'm not willing to do that again. Besides, my personal attitude about the site has changed significantly over the years, and I don't think you want someone that cranky in charge of the brainstorm tribe.

      And on a logistical level, it would be a bad idea. I still get a couple of personal messages a month from some user asking me to help them solve some problem with the site. They either don't know I left two years ago,or they think I still have some pull on the site. If I were to moderate an official or official-looking Tribe tribe, that confusion would only get worse.

      Plus, I don't really have the time and energy to dedicate to it. I sometimes don't read this tribe for weeks.

      I would, however, nominate Mike. I've met him, and I've seen him interact with the site over the years.

      Incidentally, the Tribe code mostly supports multiple moderators. The UI for it has never been done, and there's some business logic that would need to be worked out if it became a global feature, but I'm pretty sure that one line of SQL would be all it takes to add a second moderator to a tribe. Just sayin'.
      • Re: Deleting the Brainstorm tribe

        Sat, March 29, 2008 - 7:46 AM
        I'm sorry to read this. I think you would be perfect. "Cranky" is what this tribe needs, me thinks! At least in the interim for cleaning house, anyway! ;O) I do understand your reasons for declining, though.

        >> While I worked at Tribe, I had a certain personal ethic when mixing it up on the site: always be polite and courteous to the users, no matter how much of clueless fucking assholes they were. Never flame. Always be helpful. If you look back through my history, I'm pretty sure that you'll find I did an exemplary job of it. <<

        I am a witness to this and if called to testify I will put a hand on that icky bible thingy!