Active Members idea

topic posted Tue, January 27, 2009 - 9:00 PM by  Unsubscribed
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
Rather than having those six slots occupied by people who just update their profile, how about those six slots being used for the last six posters/members who posted?

It would give people an instant idea of who is participating RIGHT NOW in any given tribe at any point in time.

Active members = PARTICIPATING members.

Some people are joiners and join every single tribe, and then bless everyone else with their avatar image in every single tribe, because they update their profile every single minute. LOL!

But they don't DO anything in every single tribe. Some people don't even post in various tribes, they just join and lurk.

So how about making Active = Participate, with the option to sort members alphabetically, by date joined, and by last activity?

I'm more interested in the participating members, and learning more about them, than I am in seeing the images of lurkers parading across the top of the screen when they contribute nothing to the discussions.
posted by:
Unsubscribed
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: Active Members idea

    Tue, January 27, 2009 - 10:14 PM
    Yes, sorting is good! Lots of options for sorting and displaying. The reasoning behind the current six slots had to do with balancing recent activity with an optimized search that wasn't as taxing every time the tribe page was viewed. But the new version will deal with such queries better so we could go with a more useful cast of characters for those slots.
    • Unsu...
       

      Re: Active Members idea

      Wed, January 28, 2009 - 3:47 AM
      By sorting the members, I meant in the membership roster area, where all members are listed. On the HUGE tribes, it is a problem for moderators to find various members. If moderators could sort by recent activity, it would be easier for them to either boot trolls from their moderated tribes, or pass on the moderatorship to someone.

      Also for the membership roster area, if the tribe number exceeds maybe 1,000 people, it could have the feature of listing the alphabet above the membership (at least for the moderator). Many sites sort alpha and allow a person to go to a letter of choice with the contents listed for that letter. Click on "C" to find Carolyn. Numbers have a place. And then symbols in general.
      ---

      In addition to having the members show up as being active, I mentioned in another thread about members or moderators being able to turn off their avatar image for a specific thread. If it was made so that the image reverts to the question mark head, that would NOT show up in the grouping of active/participating members. That then gives the person a measure of privacy.

      So that, if I just joined this tribe and wanted to be invisible to passersby, I set my preference for this tribe to not show my avatar image in the active members listing. And my personal image would show up as a question mark head in THIS thread. And in the membership roster, it would also show up as a question mark head.

      It would look no different than any other question mark head. It would not attract undue attention that way, causing more people to click on the "person who is obviously hiding something" profile. It's a bit of privacy that would be nice for some circumstances for the user.

      It's a measure of keeping people in line that like to push the limits in certain tribes, so the moderator has control over the image for their own tribe too. It doesn't have to be a "naughty" image either (wink wink nudge nudge). For instance, check this thread:
      uspolitics.tribe.net/thread/...f8ac6b38

      Why yes, there ARE three of the same images and similar names. Only ONE is the real one. It's like a Tribe "To Tell The Truth" game. The real one is the one with the Premium Star. Two were made to be annoying. And others are just goofing off.

      So, the moderator could shut off the annoying impostors with their own controls. Poof. No confusing images.

      I know that following patterns of abuse is easier if people aren't auto-unsubscribed. Here's what TOU COULD do with THEIR ability to turn off images site-wide for any particular user...

      POOF, the fakes have their avatar image disappear (an image mute) from EVERYWHERE, just like that, with the TOU control. TOU could also "mute images" in the profiles, and even all images posted by them anywhere.

      There are people that abuse posting in photos as much as they abuse posting in text. Stealing other people's avatars to create alts that fool other people, stealing other people's original content photos, putting up inappropriate photos in certain tribes.

      The photo has not been DELETED, it's muted. For whatever level it has been done at.

      Muted by the member OR the moderator in any specific tribe. Muted by TOU Gal over Tribe.net entire.

      Similar things have been proposed for things like "My Friend's Blogs" and "My Friend's Photos", allowing any user to filter the incoming information. To "mute" someone who has prolific blogs taking up all the home page space pushing off the one little blog from the person who rarely blogs. Same for photos.

      And I definitely prefer the term "mute" for ignoring members rather than "killfile". Like you can mute a TV if you need to chat on the phone. A nice selective filter.
      • Unsu...
         

        Re: Active Members idea

        Wed, January 28, 2009 - 11:07 AM
        I said:
        " In addition to having the members show up as being active, I mentioned in another thread about members or moderators being able to turn off their avatar image for a specific thread. "

        I meant:
        " In addition to having the members show up as being active, I mentioned in another thread about members or moderators being able to turn off their avatar image for a specific TRIBE. "
  • Re: Active Members idea

    Wed, January 28, 2009 - 12:33 AM

    I think that's a great idea!!

    Which got me thinking, how about considering this as an adjunct rather than a replacement? I say let's not get trapped within the form of the current format and talk about possibilities of the next one. Meaning, how about having at least four areas:

    1) Participating Members (Active in Viewed Tribe)

    2) Related Members (Tribe-wide, customized for Xdegrees of relatedness)

    3) Related Tribes (Interrelated to Viewed Tribe, sorted by activity level)

    4) Active Tribes (Tribe-wide, customized for Xdegrees of relatedness)


    That provides an overall picture of current, related activity of your choosing.
    • Re: Active Members idea

      Wed, January 28, 2009 - 11:03 AM
      @skooter

      For a while I"ve been thinking retro and wanting to see tribe bring back the degrees of separation all over.. I really miss that.

      Way back on a listing you could choose 1 degree, 2 degree, 3 degree, entire network... etc etc. Everything on the site was handled with degrees. Most of it got tossed out which was too bad. I think right around the time the avatars ere moved from the right to the left side of the page.

      --S
      • Re: Active Members idea

        Wed, January 28, 2009 - 12:08 PM
        I really like this idea.

        I love that some constructive dialogue is taking place here. Very refreshing. I hate to say it, but I invest a great deal of time posting photos for my friends. Hundreds of tribers have sent me countless messages of how my photos make their day go by better because they can feel the beauty of the places I photograph. Tribe is truly an amazing venue to share creativity and friendship. The more thoughtful energy put into this project the better!
        • Unsu...
           

          Re: Active Members idea

          Wed, January 28, 2009 - 5:40 PM
          Jamilla, it was your own problem that got me to thinking about an option for TOU Gal to mute an entire profile's images, as well as blocking that person's ability to post images across tribe.net.

          Sayings like "Necessity is the mother of invention" come to mind.

          As it is currently with photos (anyone's photos), the photo can be flagged. TOU looks at it. Makes a decision. It could be deleted. The user can then upload the same image. It can be flagged. TOU looks at it. Makes a decision............

          And TOU doesn't want to delete accounts in the same way it used to. There had to be another way of dealing with that specific problem.

          Members have porn-spammed images. They have posted the same image again and again, in the same tribe, or in many tribes, to be obnoxious. Members have taken other people's personal photos and used the photos as if they were the person in the image. There is the copyright questions, and if someone is taking someone else's ANYTHING and using it without permission, it ought not be allowed. Photos of your artwork, photos of your sculpture, photos of your car, etc.

          Your own scenic photos, have you done a gallery show? Consider checking into it, using a name/site different from whatever you currently use. Keep the two businesses SEPARATE!!! Which may mean posting less of your images online, but also bringing in some money from people passing through the area who want to capture the scenic beauty of the area and have the photographic skills of rock. It is a learned skill and tourists don't always have the skill. They also tend to have someone in the image from their family with looks dorky and misses the beauty of the area.
          • Re: Active Members idea

            Wed, January 28, 2009 - 6:34 PM
            I have had several one woman shows and my photos hit the front page of the paper on a regular basis. My fotos are hanging all over town. I don't post fotos on tribe to sell, I post them to share this amazing place and to remind everyone that we are stewards of this marvelous planet and we need to take better care of it.
            • Re: Active Members idea

              Wed, January 28, 2009 - 6:39 PM
              Have you considered using a watermark on the photos you post on tribe? I know a number of photogs which do this to safeguard their images...
              • Re: Active Members idea

                Wed, January 28, 2009 - 7:07 PM
                Thanks I will look into it. I don't mind at all if someone uses my photo. I just ask that they give me credit. No big thing unless someone is trying to harass me and BAIT me, like the woman in my case does. She steals the fotos and then says she took them. or doesn't know who did. She took one out of a slide show of mine and I have flagged it over 20 times and it has never been removed. I have had NO other problems with my photos from anyone. They can use them in any way they see fit, just give me credit. Because of tribe one of my fotos is the screensaver for the Chicago Fire Dept. Tribe is very cool
                • Re: Active Members idea

                  Wed, January 28, 2009 - 7:12 PM
                  I highly recommend watermarking. Why trust others to credit you, when you can credit yourself?
                  You've been burned (which so completely sucks - one of my least favorite tribe stories), so why not take away the matches and prevent being burned in the future?
                  Please do think about it : )

                  Aloha!
  • Re: Active Members idea

    Thu, January 29, 2009 - 8:26 PM
    The down side of the idea.

    You already know who is participating in the tribe by the names against posts and threads.

    And I often find it interesting to read frequent readers who dont post. In a tribe like the Trivia Tribe, it is nice to know there are more folks interested in it than those who post.. in a tribe like that, it is nice to see people are reading it.

    What would be good would be to give moderators an option to display avatars at the top of the tribe either according to number of posts OR most recent post OR most recent visit....
    • Unsu...
       

      Re: Active Members idea

      Thu, January 29, 2009 - 9:31 PM
      You only know from the glance of the main page who posts. You don't know who is IN those threads.

      Secondly, those images at the top of your tribe and this tribe have NOTHING to do with reading or visiting either tribe. You do understand that, right?

      Those images are updated in every single tribe that a member belongs to WHEN THEY UPDATE THEIR PROFILE.

      That's the ONLY reason those images are at the top of any tribe. It has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with a person visiting the tribe. Nothing.

      Change your avatar image, you pop in the top six. Change any info in your bio, including adding a period, you move into the position of the top six.

      I want to be able to see (without having to check the most recent posts by opening each thread) who is participating. I don't give a hoot about the dimwits that constantly update their profiles to hog the six positions at the top so that we get the same damn people all the time, usually people that don't even participate.
      • Re: Active Members idea

        Thu, January 29, 2009 - 9:41 PM
        What determines the "Top 5" active moderators? I'm so glad I havent been in that for a long time now. I used to get so much shit. Some good shit with bad shit though for sure. I always thought it kind of sucked because if a certain person wanted to posted nonstop bs just to be and stay in the top 5 then basically that person could litter Tribe up with unlimited sewage. He could pretend to be some fabulously nice person. All the while severely harassing certain people in various ways. Somone could be a total full on power tripping control freak sociopath, and be A #1 on Tribe. Woo hoo!!! Most certainly, human s___ is surely deserving of recognition and applause! Yaaaay!!! And the parasite remains. Quality over quantity. Duh.

        And do the pics at the top of a tribe change based on who is posting in that tribe or on tribe in general. Not just because someone updates their profile? I see alot of the same peeps in that area. I wonder sometimes why people are in that area but have never really known for sure. It's never really bothered me though. I just figured it was because they are active Tribers or because they are a part of my extended network or something.
        • Unsu...
           

          Re: Active Members idea

          Thu, January 29, 2009 - 9:52 PM
          After seeing you make a tribe and repetitively post the same thing for hours, that had to have been the most desperate thing I've ever seen on Tribe. About this time:
          tribes.tribe.net/2c8791f2-...a1012a2742

          It has to do with activity in tribes that are moderated by that person. If you make a tribe that has many people posting, you move into that spot. If you go nuts and post again and again, you also move into that spot. It currently doesn't discriminate between spamming your own tribe and genuine posts. But it was talked about to change that moderators section to prohibit a moderator from spamming their own tribe, somehow.

          Perhaps Tribe Help can tell us exactly what the Top 5 moderator weight is, if it's number of posts in the tribe only? That would explain why you could move into the Top 5 spot by spamming a tribe you moderated in which you were the only member.

          But one person can't compete with 10 or 50 or 100 active participants. It makes more sense to develop a GOOD, ACTIVE tribe that you can devote your time to, to keep it running, than to have a smattering of inactive tribes that go nowhere.
          • Re: Active Members idea

            Thu, January 29, 2009 - 10:02 PM
            Um. The tribe I created where I was the only member was called 666. The alt ( One of the few I have ever created unlike some. ) was called 666. I was performing a test. I stated this as well. It was no big secret. And with my M profile I found myself in the top 5 without even trying. I created and still moderate many tribes out of my interest in the subjects. Not at all for the sole purpose of being in the top 5. But it was obious to many that a particular person would post nonstop just to keep himself there. It was an obsession. 90% of the posts looked like this. "Good job." " . " " Welcome _____ . " "What? You farted? What a lovely bouquet!" lol

            It would be interesting to see how many alts that person has at this very time. And not just how many. But which ones specifically.
            • Unsu...
               

              Re: Active Members idea

              Fri, January 30, 2009 - 11:01 AM
              Mr. M says:
              " But it was obious to many that a particular person would post nonstop just to keep himself there. It was an obsession. 90% of the posts looked like this. "Good job." " . " " Welcome _____ . " "What? You farted? What a lovely bouquet!" lol "

              And how is that any different from moderators like Bloke in the Trivia Tribe or Aunt Bea in her tribe? Lots of moderators are into welcoming people into their tribe, making that person feel at home by chatting them up. Keeping the conversation going via laughter, short comments, being silly.

              Trolls do the same thing, comment on a lot, keep the arguing going, continue to attack, but it's generally not their own tribe. And it is often spread out among alts.

              What difference does it make how many alts a person has in conjunction with being a top moderator? The posts of the alts don't count towards the moderator's count. So, anyone could make a lot of alts to talk to themselves, which seems to be very popular on Tribe.

              Short comments are not only on Tribe, it's all over. People who comment with "I like it" or "I hate it" or "IDK" or various slang terms or abbreviations. Even if this very thread, there are comments that are short. Why is that bad?
              • Re: Active Members idea

                Fri, January 30, 2009 - 6:14 PM
                Short posts arent bad djarum. When you look at a very high percentage of total posts though the picture becomes a little clearer. When I consider 90% or more of what someone posts to be comepletely useless bs I quit paying attention. Or at least I try to. If the person doesnt stalk me and make up all kinds of bullshit lies about me. And create an alt with a profile dedicated to defamation of character. If the person wasnt such a creep he eventually gets permanently 86'd from Tribe. Yet kept coming back and threatening to sue or whatever and is now allowed back on the site. Yay. Cheers to the King of theTrolls!
                • Re: Active Members idea

                  Fri, January 30, 2009 - 9:48 PM
                  ya mama eats ho hos and you're the postman's son.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: Active Members idea

                    Sat, January 31, 2009 - 8:04 AM
                    I love postmen! Especially ones that always ring twice. But just for the record, imho, Ho Ho's & Ding Dongs were named wrong. There was a mix up. Because Ho ho's should have been named Ding Dongs and Ding Dongs should have been named Ho Ho's. There should be a campaign to make this happen. Surely the world would be a better place.
        • Re: Active Members idea

          Fri, January 30, 2009 - 12:49 AM
          Top 5 active mods is a spam top of. People who are mods that are posting teh most crap in teh tribes they moderate. It's an inane metric.

          OTOH....


          What I've always wanted was a thread hit count. How many people are clicking and reading a thread. We have Event & listing hit counts....

          --S
          • Unsu...
             

            Re: Active Members idea

            Fri, January 30, 2009 - 1:26 AM
            " Thread hit count "

            That's when I find out how incredibly dull I am posting such helpful topics as "Winter Driving Tips".

            It doesn't tell me how many individuals look at the thread (on another site), but it does tell me how many times the thread has been read.

            My threads? Snooze fest.

            Painting calipers? Hot topic!
            • Re: Active Members idea

              Fri, January 30, 2009 - 2:14 AM
              The only metric we have now is replys. Not a very accurate measurement.

              --S
              • Unsu...
                 

                Re: Active Members idea

                Fri, January 30, 2009 - 2:24 AM
                It might do more to encourage the crap drama posts though.
                • Re: Active Members idea

                  Fri, January 30, 2009 - 2:47 AM
                  Or might show how many people are actually reading the bullshit.

                  --S
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    Unsu...
                     

                    Re: Active Members idea

                    Fri, January 30, 2009 - 4:46 AM
                    Yeah, but you have to look into the thread to see who is there. And if it's going to be a crock or not.

                    Using the Sticky feature for featuring a member as the Madame suggested is a good idea. So that various members can be featured for a period of time, and then the thread can be un-stickied, and the next featured member stuck at the top of the threads.

                    One thing that Tribe has as an advantage in MY eyes is that it's not jumbled. It's a very straight-forward format. Over on Ning, they have many options, for movies and music and features and pictures and....so much that you don't know what is important. There's stuff all over the place.

                    And too many color choices for the main pages. Everyone here has the same appearance for their tribe. And it's easy on the eyes.

                    But I do like having the ability to customize my profile on Ning. I wasn't very good at it, but it is a much better way of expressing your own personality via the profile on Ning. They have some pleasant pre-made combinations. And the ability to add, change, those colors to suit you.

                    The focus here is more on conversation and not on gadgets and gizmos and flashy screens for the tribes, and I like that.

                    The other big change I would like to see is the ability for moderators to CHOOSE the tribes along side their own tribe. So they can feature other tribes they moderate, other tribes they have an interest in, that would normally not be linked. Because as it is, going to any one tribe ends up being stuck in a particular group of people.

                    Maybe even a short text area for WHY the moderator picked each tribe, if the title isn't self-explanatory.
                    • Re: Active Members idea

                      Fri, January 30, 2009 - 12:23 PM
                      Chances are people will do one of the two things.

                      1. See the OP and skip it
                      2. Read the post and then skip it even if there are replies.

                      You have to remember, whatever your browsing habits are (and by your, I mean anyone reading) they don't matter. We're talking statistical habits. One you get a large enough sample size it doens't really matter what you do because it's looking at the big picture.

                      There is some inherent filtering that could be set up.

                      1. you score a hit the first time to visit a thread.
                      2. you score a hit when visiting a thread with new replies regardless of #1

                      anything else is ignored.

                      --S
  • Fuxxx zat.

    Thu, January 29, 2009 - 10:05 PM
    I tinkle ze avatards acrosss ze toppings should be ze featureded members chosen by ze moderator und swapped outtings every so often. When ze avatard eez clicked on, all pooosts maydeth in zat tribe by zat member woood blink on to ze screeen. If ze mimble nivver contributes, ze avatard wood show blank und ze system wooould send ze auto-request to get on ze balls or blow ze load. Nestle paws?

    I tinkle such ze feature would spotlight mimbles und serve as ze honor ov sorts zat woood garner more inclusion und participationings from ze rabble. If some biddy woood prefer not to be featured, they could respectfully hit ze "decline featured member" buttox.
    • Re: Fuxxx zat.

      Thu, January 29, 2009 - 10:08 PM
      Like OMG! Is it Bedouins Mother? : )
      • Re: Fuxxx zat.

        Thu, January 29, 2009 - 10:15 PM
        Nein. Butt donkeys fur ze compliment.

        Toon in to ze " بدوي MILFs" tribe where shee eez slated tou be one ov ze featured mimbles nixed week.
        • Re: Fuxxx zat.

          Thu, January 29, 2009 - 10:18 PM
          Mmm BABY!!! Transchannel le Deville and spank a monkey junkie to the 3rd power in the key of c.
          • Re: Fuxxx zat.

            Thu, January 29, 2009 - 10:33 PM
            Knot toadnight deer, I have to powder mein rutabaga.

            Butt seriously fuxxx, I tinkle a featured member "panel" could be ze useful moderator tool for expanding ze contributions und encouraging dormant und doormouse mimbles to contribute as well as to highlight ze members who have contributed richly in ze past razzle zen simply displaying ze usual suspects.
            • Re: Fuxxx zat.

              Thu, January 29, 2009 - 10:41 PM
              That would be cool actually. The mod being able to pick / specify the "top 5" of their tribe. Much better than the current randomness. It could also be something that's voted or agreed upon by the tribes active members. Not just the mods choice.
  • Unsu...
     

    Re: Active Members idea

    Sun, March 29, 2009 - 5:55 PM
    Bump.

    Carolyn, Could you PLEASE state clearly for the benefit of another member that the current "active members" at the top of any tribe only has to do with profile updates and has absolutely nothing to do with the member visiting the tribe.

    Some members seem to think it has to do with all kinds of mysterious and crackpot reasons. And it's as simple as the last profile update.

    Also, what constitutes a profile update? That would also be helpful to explain to this other member and future members.

    And will this be changed for Tribe 3.0? So that the most recent posters can be in the top six active member slots. TIA
    • Re: Active Members idea

      Mon, March 30, 2009 - 1:27 PM
      Ok, here's a thread that explains it at one point in time:
      tribebugs.tribe.net/thread/7...97746a760

      Sounds like there was something to do with proximity of other members to the current user taken into account as well.

      Looking through old notes, here are some criteria that go into determining "activity":

      1. Is logged in
      2. Has a main photo
      3. Account older than 30 days
      4. Has posted within the last 7 days
      5. At least one friend
      • Unsu...
         

        Re: Active Members idea

        Mon, March 30, 2009 - 4:53 PM
        That was long before the change was made to add our own image.
        tribebugs.tribe.net/thread/d...7b05fc8ed

        You don't KNOW what the active members area at the top of each tribe means?
        • Re: Active Members idea

          Mon, March 30, 2009 - 9:01 PM
          I didn't write the code, so no, I don't know... I could spend hours reading it (both the current and the past, and isn't always which files are which) but unfortunately I don't have hours to spend on this just now... I do notice that I always see myself, so I suspect being logged in has the most to do with it.
      • Unsu...
         

        Re: Active Members idea

        Mon, March 30, 2009 - 5:31 PM
        I just made a test account. Using the peanut butter pie image. No friends. No posts.

        I am talking about ACTIVE MEMBERS area, where the images are displayed. That area is based solely upon when a person last updated their profile.

        I asked about PROFILE UPDATED information. What specifically constitutes a PROFILE UPDATE?

        That is different than "activity". As my "test" account is brand new, it is the most recently updated profile.
        1. Yes, it was logged in
        2. Yes, it has a photo
        3. No, the account is minutes old
        4. No, the account has not posted anywhere
        5. No, it has no friends
        • Re: Active Members idea

          Mon, March 30, 2009 - 9:02 PM
          I believe a profile update is when you change your icon or the information in your bio.
          • Re: Active Members idea

            Mon, March 30, 2009 - 10:15 PM
            I rarely update my profile and end up with my icon plastered over almost all of the tribes I'm a member after making only a few posts.
            • Unsu...
               

              Re: Active Members idea

              Mon, March 30, 2009 - 10:24 PM
              Got links?
              • Re: Active Members idea

                Wed, April 1, 2009 - 11:31 PM
                Sure do. All the tribes on my profile page.
                • Re: Active Members idea

                  Wed, April 1, 2009 - 11:36 PM
                  Most of the tribes you belong to have little activity. Most of the members of those tribes rarely, if ever, update their profiles. That is why you will likely be in the active members at the top of the page. You last updated in February, not so long ago. If you look at the more active and more populated tribes on your list you are no longer in the 6 active member spots. You will be in an instant if you update your profile however.

                  It's all about updating one's profile. There is no other factor that puts you in that active members spot at the top of a tribe.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: Active Members idea

                    Wed, April 1, 2009 - 11:58 PM

                    Ahh, I think you're right. I just looked through a few and they icons show up in chronological based on profile edit date. Huh. Gonna have to rethink some things.
          • Re: Active Members idea

            Tue, March 31, 2009 - 12:23 AM
            <I believe a profile update is when you change your icon or the information in your bio.>

            I think it is also any other change.. like adding a word to your bio.

            Someone wanna test this for Carolyn ?
            • Unsu...
               

              Re: Active Members idea

              Tue, March 31, 2009 - 12:26 AM
              It's as easy as adding or deleting a period in the bio. And that's all I did just now. A single period.
            • Re: Active Members idea

              Tue, March 31, 2009 - 8:18 AM
              Yeah, it's any change at all. I've got a couple of modules that I change regularly, and any time I do I'm all of a sudden an "active member" of all of my tribes. Even though I'm usually a lurker.
              • Re: Active Members idea

                Wed, April 1, 2009 - 12:09 AM
                Configuring a module on your profile or home page, such as choosing to list only some of your tribes in the tribes module instead of all of them, will update your profile and put you in the 6 active members of all the tribes you are in. Even changing your email preferences will update your profile and bring you to the 6 active members.

                Changing your avatar icon does not update your profile. Nor does changing the positions of the modules on your profile or home page.

                And, as already stated, even the slightest change to your bio does update your profile. And I agree with djarum, the only factor to the 6 positions of active members in a tribe is how recently the members of that tribe have updated their profile. It doesn't matter if you are signed in or not. Try looking at a tribe in which you are in one of those 6 positions when you are not logged in sometime. You'll see the order is the same and your avatar is still there.
                • Re: Active Members idea

                  Wed, April 1, 2009 - 10:24 PM
                  Hi Christie

                  What I dont get is this, I hardly ever change my profile, yet I end up in the active members list all the time, even in tribes I only read but dont post in..

                  Djarum once said this was because people in my friends list update theirs.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    Unsu...
                     

                    Re: Active Members idea

                    Wed, April 1, 2009 - 10:28 PM
                    No I didn't. It's only when YOU update YOUR profile.

                    You updated your profile YESTERDAY:
                    last updated 03/31/09
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    Unsu...
                     

                    Re: Active Members idea

                    Wed, April 1, 2009 - 10:30 PM
                    And provide links to these tribes, please. Although you will be in the top 6, since you just updated your profile. It doesn't matter that you don't post, it only matters when YOU update YOUR profile.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: Active Members idea

                    Wed, April 1, 2009 - 11:33 PM
                    Bloke wrote: ...What I dont get is this, I hardly ever change my profile, yet I end up in the active members list all the time, even in tribes I only read but dont post in..
                    >

                    I rarely update my profile and end up in the active lists of my subscribed tribes all the time after making only a few posts.

                    Like here, I just made two posts in this thread, the first today. And in several subscribed tribes I now show up in their active list. yet I haven't made any updates to my profile since 2/20/09.

                    But I'm not showing up in all of my subscribed tribes. I suspect the formula has something to do with comparative quantity of posts.

Recent topics in "Tribe.net Brainstorm"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
Suggestion for a new privacy feature 22 Yesterday, 12:14 AM
who can , also how do thread delete? Unknown Comic 8 December 24, 2009
we got scammed? Mike 14 December 18, 2009
This tribe sux total ass! Mr. M 4 December 16, 2009